This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

🇨🇴 Colombia earthquake

🗒 Trump’s press secretary

🤖 AI in Congress

Spirit Airlines data

Hi friends,

Chris Vazquez, your Friday newsletter writer here. At LNI, a core part of our mission is making the news less scary. But that sometimes poses a tricky question: What do we do when the news is scary? Case in point: last week’s earthquake in Colombia. A disaster that caused hundreds of deaths and thousands of injuries is undeniably tragic.

But as Dave said in his video about it, it’s also undeniably heartwarming to see communities come together in rescue efforts. Hundreds of lives were lost; hundreds were also saved. We saw devastating damage; we also saw resiliency plans in action. We absolutely can’t look away from the bad, scary things happening in the world. We also can’t make it impossible to process, and we can’t ignore the good. If we do, we aren’t telling the whole story, and we’re driving ourselves into fear and inaction. With that, let’s dive in.

Recovery efforts after Colombia earthquake

  • Last week, a magnitude 7.4 earthquake hit western Colombia, killing over 300 people. The cities of Cali, Manizales and Pereira were hit especially hard, as were the places in between.

  • The disaster response has been widespread and ongoing. Al Jazeera reports that emergency response teams have saved over 350 lives. Rescue teams and aid organizations are now focusing on providing shelter and other necessities for people affected.

  • Some cities affected by last week’s earthquake had only recently finished rebuilding from another deadly earthquake in 1999. Armenia, a Colombian city devastated by that quake, saw zero deaths from this recent earthquake. Engineers and officials told The Washington Post that’s because of the post-1999 planning and reconstruction efforts, which Colombia dedicated a $1 billion fund to. Those efforts weren’t perfect, but the city is nevertheless being looked at as a model for disaster preparedness.

A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR

Dave here in this message on behalf of our partner beehiiv, the reason this newsletter even exists! beehiiv recently released a bunch of cool new features, including a visual editor and community features.

beehiiv is a fantastic platform for creators and independent journalists (like me)! Use my special code DAVE30 and get 30% off your first three months.

Dave here again (remember me?) after the beehiiv graphic to remind you (in case you’ve already forgotten) to use code DAVE30 and get 30% off your first three months of beehiiv.

America’s Next Top Liar

  • Karoline Leavitt announced on social media this week that she will step down as White House press secretary at the end of this month. Speculation swirled that it was because she was left on a plane that Trump was smuggled off of following a threat from Iran. If my boss left me on a plane that might get attacked without telling me, I’d be mad! But that’s almost definitely not what happened. A New York Times reporter and a White House spokesperson told Snopes that Leavitt wasn’t on the plane. And other reporting shows she was on parental leave while that airplane switcheroo happened.

  • We don’t know yet who will replace her. But some people believe it could be Natalie Harp, whose intense love for Donald Trump has reportedly freaked out even the Secret Service. Her job seems to be to go where Trump goes, including onto the non-decoy airplane that Trump was smuggled onto.

  • One administration official reportedly told NBC News that Trump isn’t in a rush to replace Leavitt before the midterms. During Leavitt’s last absence amid her parental leave, the administration didn’t name an interim press secretary and instead had administration officials hold press briefings.

  • That brings us to this week’s media literacy tip from our friends at MediaWise! News about public figures can be overwhelming. Here’s how to stay on top of it.

Need to write a law? Just ask Chat.

  • A lawmaker in New Brunswick, Canada, went viral at the end of last month for delivering a speech to the legislature that was written by AI. The lawmaker read aloud lines like, “Here’s a more natural, flowing version of that section that reads like a legislative speech, rather than a series of short bullet points.”

  • Here’s another version of a bullet point on this topic, but about the U.S.: Our former colleague Anna Liss-Roy (who appeared in a bunch of videos with us, including the first iteration of LNI’s long-form show) reported that Congress is widely using AI. Unlike most workplaces, this doesn’t just mean emails from coworkers include more em dashes than usual — it means chatbots’ sometimes incoherent outputs show up in the bills shaping our everyday lives. And Anna found there are few overarching rules for how Congress uses AI.

  • Here’s a different bullet point, drawing from a different news source: POLITICO reported this week that as congressional offices and outside groups use AI more and more to write legislative proposals, congressional lawyers are having a hard time keeping up with all the errors that introduces. Those errors could lead to lawsuits. And one person said fixing those errors takes more time than writing a law from scratch.

He even goes full pants...

a lazier creator would do it waste [sic] up

@NewEstate4thDimension 

The Ghost of Data Past

  • Spirit Airlines ceased operations suddenly in May. So I can no longer get the worst flight of my life for the price of a special, but not extravagant, meal out. But in some ways, Spirit lives on. In you, in me, and in the 100 million emails, 500 million Microsoft Teams chats, HR information and financial data it left behind. Heartwarming.

  • Much as how Dr. Frankenstein desecrated the dead to create his monster, AI companies want this dearly departed airline’s data to train their models. Google agreed to pay $10 million for it, beating out another bidder named Mercor that bid $7.5 million.

  • So, is Google’s AI gonna know exactly who sent which angry Teams message about a coworker that really should’ve been a text instead? Spirit has said the data will be “deidentified” so that it can’t be traced back to individuals, and Google has agreed not to try and trace it back to specific people, either. But flight attendants still have privacy concerns around how this data will be used. A U.S. bankruptcy court still has to approve the sale.

I want YOU… to play GTA 6

  • An Army battalion in Georgia is offering some soldiers a four day pass to play “GTA 6” when it comes out in November. The catch? You have to agree to stay in the Army for at least two more years. “GTA 6” has been in development for over a decade, making it the straight guy equivalent of the MCU X-Men.

  • That’s not the only reason the Army is giving this pass. They’ve also been struggling to recruit and retain people the past few years, but since the economy is so severely in the toilet, more people have been enlisting recently for the benefits. Now, the Army is trying to find creative ways of keeping people on.

  • This question is maybe not super important, but it is one I cannot help but ask: What happens if you want four days off but you have truly no interest in playing “GTA 6”? If you’re reading this from the 9th Brigade Engineer Battalion, 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team at Fort Stewart, Georgia, I don’t think anyone is making you play this game. The pass is meant to coincide with when the game comes out, but no one seems to be checking that you’re playing the game while you’re using your time off.

  • Lest we forget that the U.S. military apparatus is a big, serious thing with big, serious consequences, let’s turn our attention to the USS Abraham Lincoln. Democratic senators have raised concerns about poor living conditions on the aircraft carrier, including reports of supply shortages, contaminated water, plumbing problems and mental health crises. So, things a four day pass to play GTA wouldn’t fix, probably. The carrier has been deployed for 270 days amid the U.S. war on Iran. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also reportedly failed to publicize Iranian strikes on the base tasked with resupplying the carrier.

Each week, after running through the news Dave has covered in the past week, I turn things over to him for some analysis. Dave, take it away!

My entire YouTube algorithm is serving me videos about how YouTube is changing its view counter. In case your algorithm isn’t overrun with creators talking about this, YouTube recently announced that watching a single frame of a video now counts as a view. I had a quick and immediate take on this when I learned the news: it’s not that views don’t matter anymore. It’s that they never mattered that much. Let me explain …

YouTube first started experimenting with this type of a view early last year with YouTube Shorts. In this new way of counting views, if a person watched a frame of video, or if it showed up via autoplay, then it was now the standard “view.” For a while, in the backend, you could simultaneously see something called an “engaged view,” which was the old way of measuring a view (someone watching it for a few seconds, or clicking to play it). 

On average, I would say the engaged view count is about 60% of the normal view count. Here’s an example from our video about Trump’s decoy plane in Turkey.

It’s a significant difference, but it has almost zero impact on how I personally gauge the success of a video. That’s because I’m far more concerned with two other metrics: comments and average view duration.

The comment section is the true measure of actual, real engagement. This is where people decide that watching the video wasn’t enough. They have to engage further — whether it’s a compliment, a complaint, a joke or comparing me to JD Vance.

YouTube can’t fake the comment count number. And YouTube is also far better at detecting bots than most platforms. So it’s rare that a comment section is artificially inflated by AI bots trying to get me to click on their profile for a good time (as the Washington Post TikTok account once experienced for an entire year).

Average view duration, which is quite simply how long people watched the video on average, will correctly predict the success of a video, on any platform, 100% of the time. If the average view duration is low, it didn’t do well. If it’s higher than the length of the video, people watched the whole thing and some of it again. That means it went super viral. Every single time. You can start to see why I didn’t even bat an eye at this new view count system.

I haven’t spoken to a YouTube rep about the change, but I imagine this way of counting views became necessary as standard YouTube videos and Shorts have become more integrated. When the view count method is different between two videos on the same platform, it’s difficult to measure them against each other. It’s even harder now that the “engaged view” count on Shorts is harder to find in YouTube Studio.

The “engaged view” box is automatically unchecked in the advanced video analytics section.

Finally, if you’re trying to sell ads on both your Shorts and long-form videos, it’s hard to share those metrics with potential buyers when the view count works differently. Speaking of long-form … our new weekly series premieres mid-September! It’s finally coming! Make sure to subscribe on YouTube

If you made it to the end of this newsletter, you get two rewards. The first is a pet picture from a loyal reader.

I don’t have a name for this cutie, but they look so alert

Your next reward is the reveal for our link scavenger hunt, the weekly game in which I hide a non-news-related link in the body of this email and task you with finding it. In honor of this being the first newsletter since the MCU X-Men cast was announced, I linked out to a comic book issue summary of the X-Men meeting Frankenstein.

Until next week!

Chris

Reply

Avatar

or to participate